Are smart walls smart solutions? The impact of technologically-charged borders on human rights in Europe / Bronagh Kieran, Fuensanta Amorós Cascales, Laura Thomi, Meredith Veit
2019
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Are smart walls smart solutions? The impact of technologically-charged borders on human rights in Europe / Bronagh Kieran, Fuensanta Amorós Cascales, Laura Thomi, Meredith Veit
Imprint
Venice, Italy: Global Campus of Human Rights, 2019
Language Note
English
Summary
This article reviews new technologies on the external border of the
European Union, and the human rights ramifications of these developments. It
utilises a multi-disciplinary approach, writing on the emerging technologies
themselves, their impact on vulnerable groups, legal developments relating to
privacy, and the political context informing migration policy. The first part
outlines emerging trends in border technology. The discussion relies on examples
beyond the European Union to inform its analysis, including case studies from
the United States border with Mexico. Technological developments considered
include thermal imaging; biometric data; virtual reality; artificial intelligence;
and drones. The second part explores how vulnerable groups will be affected by
the collection of biometrics at the external border of the European Union. This
part explores how algorithms, far from being objective arbiters, in fact are
repositories for the bias of the manufacturer. The article postulates that to tackle
the proliferation of bias, it is necessary to have a diverse workforce creating
these systems. Third, the article addresses the regulatory framework on data
privacy in the European Union. The significance of a right to privacy post-9/11
context is described. The conception of data privacy of the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) is set out. This part first analyses how GDPR has
affected the processing and storage of data in the EU and, second, draws out the
implications for the data of migrants. Special emphasis is placed on the concept
of consent, and the ability of migrants to refuse the collection of their data is put
into question. Finally, the article turns to the political context. Arguing that
right-wing populism is not inherently opposed to new technologies, the article
points to populists’ reliance on social media to garner support. Furthermore, it is
advanced that the potential for migrants’ human rights to be impinged by new
technologies is compounded by the influence of right-wing populism on
migration policy.
Key words: smart borders; surveillance; consent; privacy; biometrics; human
rights; vulnerable groups; securitisation; technology; artificial intelligence
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Language
English