Crossing the externalised border : a postcolonial perspective on outsourcing asylum by Australia and the EU / Jasmine Erkan
2020
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Crossing the externalised border : a postcolonial perspective on outsourcing asylum by Australia and the EU / Jasmine Erkan
Author
Imprint
Venice, Italy: Global Campus of Human Rights, 2020
Language Note
English
Summary
The Westphalian state system divides sovereign territory through the use of “imaginary
lines”, or rather, sovereign borders. In recent years, we have been witnessing states of
the Global North cooperating with the Global South in an effort to extend these borders
with the goal of preventing migrants from accessing sovereign territory. This thesis will
analyse, from a postcolonial perspective, how Australia and the EU have outsourced
their asylum responsibilities and examine the implications this has for the protection of
human rights and the diffusion of human rights norms across the globe. Can recognising
the legacy of colonialism aid us in making sense of how normative powers such as
Australia and the EU utilise their normative might to persuade poorer, dependent
neighbours such as Indonesia and Turkey that it is in their interest to cooperate in their
border operations? Are Australia and the EU effectively redefining the conception of the
refugee from its humanitarian manifestation to a more securitised understanding of the
term? This thesis will explore the concept of the “postcolonial refugee” as a victim of a
system that has been defined by the era of colonialism while also as an object that is
traded between the North–South impasse.
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Language
English