On coming to terms with the past : which justice to come for a post-criminal state society? / Laurence Petrone
2010
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
On coming to terms with the past : which justice to come for a post-criminal state society? / Laurence Petrone
Author
Imprint
Venice, Italy: Global Campus of Human Rights, 2010
Language Note
English
Summary
In coming to an answer how a society can come to terms with a past where human rights violations were inherently part of the state system, this research suggests that a comprehensive transitional justice approach with different mechanisms to address wrongdoing is imperative and should include a differentiated notion of guilt and a differentiated profile of the protagonists involved by commission, omission, or submission. This research focuses on the complex reality entailed by a ‘criminal state’. The latter is characterised by different agents embodied by individual as well as collective units. Coming to terms with a past entailing these agents, requires a shortand long-term strategy to address the wide range of agents entailed in different degrees of responsibility. In an abstract sense this research states that an action induced by a complex reality necessitates an equally differentiated reaction. As a consequence this research is contributed to the appeal made by Laurel Fletcher to contemplate the impact and/or (in)effectiveness of post-conflict mechanisms to address past wrongs. An analysis of a ‘criminal state’ is followed by a critical assessment of the mechanisms of transitional justice as they are conceptualised today. The research is concluded with the analysis of two test cases exemplifying system guilt, viz. post-Nazi West-Germany and post-apartheid South Africa.
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Language
English